Model B · distinct-person headcount · sponsor excluded · MGW.reference.ballast-headcount.072026.v1 (content = 071926.v2) · regenerated live from mrx_bethune.gasplant_positions 7/20/26 · this is the map-canonical count the viewer reads
Community sentiment is oppose-plurality, 2-to-1 over support: 28 oppose / 14 support / 9 mixed / 5 neutral across 56 distinct people on record.
WhyThis counts people (each person's latest stance), not claims. It is the number to quote publicly — the claim count (Model A) reads far more lopsided.
The catchIn-person hearings ran ~4:1 against. Facebook was the only near-even venue, and its support is thin — one-line asserted comments, not verified testimony.
Rows, not distinct people — a 6/23 speaker who returned 7/14 appears in both. This is how each room broke.
| Venue | oppose | support | mixed | neutral | total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/23/26 — second reading | 7 | 3 | 1 | — | 11 |
| FB threads + petition + off-meeting (collected 6/26–7/07) | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 21 |
| 7/14/26 — third reading (passed 4–3) | 22 | 7 | 4 | — | 33 |
Provenance. mrx_bethune.gasplant_positions, project-ballast, read-only fresh pivot 2026-07-20. 65 rows → 56 distinct people (DISTINCT ON stakeholder, latest as_of_date). Numbers match the filed 071926.v2 record exactly. Model B counts people; Model A counts claims (189 oppose / 68 pro / 20 mixed / 6 neutral across 283 atomics) — the two are never summed. Venue-weighting rule: verified in-person testimony outweighs asserted single FB comments.